Saturday January 14, 2006 | ${log.root}/lowem.log Inflation, Investing and Everything |
|
people.lulu.com, energybulletin.net : There is a lot of talk about the hydrogen economy. It is at best naïve, and at worst it is dishonest. A hydrogen economy would be a pitiful, impoverished thing indeed. There are a number of problems with hydrogen fuel cells. Many of these are engineering problems which could probably be worked out in time. But there is one basic flaw which will never be overcome. Free hydrogen is not an energy source; it is rather an energy carrier. Free hydrogen does not exist on this planet, so to derive free hydrogen we must break the hydrogen bond in molecules. Basic chemistry tells us that it requires more energy to break a hydrogen bond than to form one. This is due to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and there is no getting around it. All free hydrogen generated today is derived from natural gas. So right off the bat we have not managed to escape our dependency on nonrenewable hydrocarbons. Splitting hydrogen from water requires an even higher energy investment per unit of water (286kJ per mole). Even hydrogen fuel derived from nuclear power would be expensive. To fill a car up with enough hydrogen to be equivalent to a 15 gallon gas tank could cost as much as $400. Compressed and liquefied hydrogen both require energy and so further reduce the net energy ratio of the hydrogen. In fact, all forms of pure hydrogen are difficult to store. Hydrogen is the smallest element and, as such, it can leak from any container, no matter how well sealed it is. Hydrogen in storage will evaporate at a rate of at least 1.7% per day. Automobile engineers and others within the industry do not believe we will ever have a hydrogen economy. Daimler-Chrysler has admitted as much. Rather than developing a hydrogen economy, it makes more sense — and will always make more sense — to buy a more efficient car, ride public transport, bicycle or walk. See also : 1. Singapore is "well-positioned" to become a hydrogen producing centre: BP (2006-01-14 08:00:07 SGT)
[Energy]
Permalink
Comments:
Post a Comment: Comments are closed for this entry. Most popular blog postings on lowem.log : 1. Singapore MRT rail network length to double by 2020 Featured articles on lowem.log : 1. Book review : Shut Down by William Flynn |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||