The U.S. unemployment rate was recently announced to have hit 7.6% with 598,000 job losses in Jan 2009. But wait. That was the headline number, the one that the press usually picks up on : the seasonally-adjusted U-3 figure. If you think that's bad, you should take a look at the non-seasonally-adjusted U-6 figure, which includes, in their own words : "Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers". That would be a more accurate figure since those part-timers and temp-ers would rather have a "real" job - if only they could find one.
So, in line with what I said earlier about a 10% unemployment rate being a possible benchmark for a Second Great Depression scenario, if you look at the U-6 figure for the US, it's already arrived. It shouldn't be that much of a surprise as the BIS had been talking about it since Jul 2007. Give it half a year or so, and if things do not significantly turn around by then, even the headline unemployment figure could go into double-digit territory. That would be something.